 |
| Day
3 — Wednesday October 8, 2003
Workshops
|
| Workshop
9: UN-HABITAT — Mission and Projects |
 |
During this workshop led by Martin Wexler,
Head of the Housing Division of the City of Montréal’s
Economic and Urban Development Department, Axumite Gebre-Egziabher
explained the necessity for convergence and international consultation
among historical cities and United Nations bodies. |
| Created in 1978 and currently active in 54 countries
on all continents, UN-HABITAT is mandated to promote sustainable
human settlements and set up programs with the goal of providing
adequate shelter. Under the banner “Water and Sanitation,”
this year’s program seeks to improve the health situation
of more than 100 million people, especially those living in urban
slums, by 2020.
“Our strategy advocates raising awareness of the importance
of establishing adequate, sustainable places to live, in both rural
and urban settings. Disaster awaits in the short term if we do not
address the issue of urban development. In Asia and in Latin America,
there is a huge, sudden influx of people toward the cities,”
Ms. Gebre-Egziabher explained.
UN-HABITAT advocates participation-based planning and cooperation
with national and local authorities in each of the countries in
which it is active. “Partnership and Participation”
are in fact two key objectives of the program. Main partners include:
- Local authorities, who play a vital role in terms of educating
and mobilizing the public;
- The World Association of Cities and Local Authorities Coordination
(WACLAC), which was set up to expand the role of local authorities;
- The United Nations Advisory Committee of Local Authorities
(UNACLA);
- NGOs, parliamentarians, private companies and foundations.
The cooperation of the League of Historical Cities is strongly
encouraged, as it showcases the importance of housing with respect
to built heritage, and promotes the values and principles connected
to it.
“Decent housing for all is part of the
notion of built heritage.
The UN-HABITAT program desires the support of the world’s
historical cities
because they share in our debates and our strategy.”
Axumite Gebre-Egziabher
Director of the New York City Office of UN-HABITAT
http://www.unhabitat.org/ |
 |
 |
| Workshop
10: Old Montréal and Montréal Heritage Web sites |
Heritage inventories are essential
tools for learning about, preserving and soundly managing urban
heritage. If made accessible to one and all, they can also be tools
for enlightened decision-making and for democracy. When entered
into computerized databases and disseminated via the World Wide
Web, they exponentially widen the possibilities for comparative
research and international exchanges.
As an example, two interrelated Web-based heritage inventories
were profiled in a presentation by Anne-Marie Dufour,
an architect specializing in heritage and coordinator of Web publication
of Montréal’s heritage inventory with the Heritage
and Toponymy Division of the City of Montréal’s Economic
and Urban Development Department, and historian Gilles Lauzon,
head of research for the Société de développement
de Montréal and heritage inventory coordinator for the official
Old Montréal Web site.
|
 |
| The original aim of the Old Montréal
Web site [www.old.montreal.qc.ca],
designed in 1998 under the aegis of the Société
de développement de Montréal and the Québec
Ministry of Culture and Communications, was to disseminate information
for the “general public” on the district’s history
and heritage. Soon, however, the site was enriched with a more technically
oriented architectural inventory destined for professionals, as
well as historical information on builders and artisans, archeological
remains, public art, streets and squares, as well as historical
personages and societies — all extremely useful to curious
visitors, experts and educators.
The Web site Inventaire architectural de Montréal: Base
de données sur le patrimoine [www.ville.montreal.qc.ca/patrimoine]
(Montréal’s Architecture Inventory: Heritage Database),
officially launched on June 19, 2003, was created pursuant to the
Agreement on the Cultural Development of Montréal between
the Québec Ministry of Culture and Communications and the
City of Montréal.
The site does not focus solely on major monuments; rather, it lays
emphasis on buildings toward which citizens have particular obligations
(ownership, historical identity, cultural appropriation) in terms
of heritage protection. It facilitates citizens’ links with
provincial and municipal administrations by providing them with
comprehensive information on permit applications, regulations and
restrictions, expert recommendations, and subsidies. Offering a
selective inventory of protected buildings and areas, the site covers
an area extending far beyond Old Montréal, and reflecting
the diversity of Montréal’s heritage.
|
 |
 |
| Workshop
11: Interconnection of Heritage Databases on the Internet |
|
Linkage of databases
is now indispensable for ensuring access to exhaustive information
as well as a coherent global vision of heritage inventories of the
world’s cities, regions and countries. |
Dedicated to the identification, promotion and
celebration of national heritage, the Canadian Register of Historic
Places is a central database with a definition sufficiently vast,
in the words of Victoria Angel, who is in charge
of its development, to include buildings, gardens, fortresses, archeological
sites, grain elevators, theatres, churches, districts and any other
historically important site. The Web site also includes the Standards
and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada,
a singular reference for heritage conservation standards and practices,
as well as a certification program for heritage sites eligible for
financial incentives. [http://www.historicplaces.ca/accueil-home_e.asp]
Daniel Lauzon, a geographer
and urban planner with the Heritage Branch of the Québec
Ministry of Culture and Communications, gave a presentation on the
challenging but extremely rewarding process of creating the Inventaire
des lieux de mémoire de la Nouvelle-France au Québec
(inventory of sites of memory of New France in Québec). The
France- and Québec-based researchers working on the project
faced an early hurdle: the absence of documented dating of inventoried
real property. Worse, it proved impossible to establish dating of
any kind. With the majority of historical buildings having undergone
multiple alterations over the course of three centuries, the question
arose as to what exactly was meant by “heritage of New France,”
especially since “French-style” construction persisted
long after the French defeat of 1759. A framing study enabled definition
of the nature of the heritage, establishment of a research methodology,
and entry into a database of a preliminary list of properties. The
overlap of variables gave such encouraging results that it led to
intense collaboration with France’s Ministry of Culture, the
Centre inter-universitaire d’Études québécoises,
Université Laval and the Région Poitou-Charentes.
Research work is ongoing. [http://www.memoirenf.cieq.ulaval.ca/Quebec/
]
Historian and programmer Léon Robichaud,
a consultant-designer for the Old Montréal and Montréal
computerized heritage inventory system, examined the interrelationship
between the [www.old.montreal.qc.ca]
Web site, dedicated to the historical district only, and [www.ville.montreal.qc.ca/patrimoine],
a part of the main City of Montréal Web site that includes
a global heritage inventory of all protected buildings and sectors
within city territory (the content of this section overlaps that
of the other site). The flexibility provided by today’s information
systems allows for the management of two inventories, with differing
purposes and completely separate user interfaces, using only one
database. The structural complexity of the heritage inventory system
led to the creation of specific types of links, and any modification
made to the database is automatically visible via both sites. And
since each item in the central database is directly associated with
the inventory for which it was created and will be updated, it will
be easy to add new sector-based inventories that will enrich the
central database while retaining their autonomy and distinct identities.
|
|
 |